Walt Disney Animation Studios Review: Robin Hood

Walt Disney Animation Studio’s 21st feature film.

http://www.megashare.info/watch-robin-hood-online-TlRFM05RPT0#

My opinion right after watching movie

My opinion right after watching the movie is that it is somewhat entertaining. When I mean somewhat, I mean that I was never bored by the film. Yes, there are scenes that drag on for too long, some filler, a flat cast, and a weird choice of music. There is more creativity in this one compared to The Aristocats, but I personally do not know about it story wise (because not much happens). This is the 5th film out of 7 (starting with One Hundred and One Dalmatians) to be directed by Wolfgang Reitherman, and the final of 3 films to have Phil Harris voice a character.

Production

This film was supposed to be about Reynard the Fox (when Disney was alive), but he felt that Reynard was too unlikable to be a hero, and ultimately shelved the project.  It was picked up soon after Disney’s death, but was changed into Robin Hood, having many of the ideas and sketches for the shelved project in this film. Because the animation department did not have a lot of money, they had an extremely small budget, causing them to reuse a lot of animation from previous films.

Story

So the film starts with the narration of a rooster named Alan-a-Dale (Roger Miller), explaining the situation about the entire England being overtaxed thanks to Prince John (Peter Ustinov). As Robin Hood (Brian Bedford) and Little John (Phil Harris) are coming up with another plan to steal money to give to the poor, Little John is confused about if they are good or bad guys, but Robin says they are good. Prince John’s carriage comes by and they decide to dress like female gypsies to get the bastard’s money, and go for John. They steal his jewelry and money, which Sir Hiss (Terry-Thomas) notices, but the annoying John tells him to shut up.

I do not know why they were not caught before they were caught. These two were not even slick with how they stole money. There were guards looking RIGHT AT Little John at the picture above, and Robin was smiling with the diamonds in his mouth. I don’t know if everyone is just dumb, or what.

So we go to the village to see Sheriff of Nottingham (Pat Buttram) taking all the money he can from people, from tipping casts, and stealing birthday money from a boy and an old man (Robin in disguise). He gives the little boy who ends up being named Skippy (Billy Whittaker). This is used as a plot device to introduce us to Maid Marian (Monica Evans) and Lady Kluck (Carole Shelley). The only useful thing in this scene we find out is that her and Robin had a child relationship, but broke up because she needed to become royalty or something like that. She still misses him. We also get some filler with the children and Lady Kluck fooling around.

I think my issue with this movie is that they try to make reasons for why I need to care for things, like their relationship, but it seems so contrived. These scenes are ridiculously long with humor and stuff, but when there are emotional or more serious scenes, it just seems forced. I also don’t like how the two stories of Robin Hood/Maid Marian, and the Town VS Prince John works. The execution just seems off to me.

So now Robin Hood is so lovestruck that he burns up the food he is making.  Alright; so yall have not seen one another in several years, don’t know how much the other changed in those several years, and they are acting like they went on a date and made love the previous night? Wouldn’t they be lusting or liking a child in that sense? We are supposed to feel bad for them, as Robin does not think it will work out, but we have not seen any reason as to why they like one another.

So Prince John hosts an archery competition to trap and arrest Robin Hood. So in the 15 minute scene, Robin Hood (who is disguised as a bird) dominates the archery competition, proposes to Marian and talk about having many children, is about to get his head cut off, and a huge ass unnecessary fight scene between the knights and villagers takes place. Prince John is extremely annoying and he needs to be amputated. I am sick of his mommy issues and his thumb sucking.

The infamous scene where there is NO original animation. Animation cells were borrowed from The Aristocats, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, and The Jungle Book. In this film, there is animation from The Sword in the Stone, that was reused from Ichabod and Mr.Toad.

So they are singing the country song Phony King of England (they say this in the film. Why is there country music in older England? Who the hell knows), where they are dissing Prince John. This song is passed down through the entire village, which enrages John and causes him to triple the taxes.

Weeks later, most of the village is in jail because they cannot afford to pay their taxes, while Little John and Robin Hood are MIA. When Friar Tuck (Andy Devie) gets arrested, Robin and Little John know that they have to  break him out, which is exactly what Prince John wants. So we get this long and suspenseful climax scene where the people are broken out of the jail, and Robin manages to steal back most of the money, but he is found out, and all of the guards, Prince John, and Sir Hiss are after him, with Robin faking sinking, so they can leave him alone.

So King Richard returns (How did he return? Apparently, he was under a hypnosis by Sir Hiss to go far away, but that is never explained or clarified), and his brother and sidekicks are prisoners working the mines. Robin Hood and Marian gets married, and Skippy and Little John are going with them; uhhhh, the point of a honeymoon is to spend time, you know JUST the couple. Also, Skippy says that they are going to have children and who is going to watch them? So his parents agreed to this? He is a kid himself. Anyways, the film ends with them riding off.

This film is not horrible, but mediocre at best. The pacing is really bad, and there are only really like 4 scenes we need to pay attention to. The characters are generic and did not get my attention. The music shifts genres at times, and the humor is so not funny.

Characters

The characters are somewhat charming at best, or plain roll eye worthy. None of them are particularly deep or anything, but I have suffered worse.

He is just the generically cocky but good hearted her. There is no depth to him, and I only know that he is a criminal, likes Maid Marian, and is friends with Little John.
He is Baloo, but is less carefree and more logical.
Typical maiden, who wants to be loved by her childhood boyfriend. Literally, that is all she is.
Pathetic, whiny, annoying, irritating, childish, unpleasant. I hate this character for not knowing when to take responsibility and not knowing when to shut the hell up. Grown ass baby, which was not funny.
Eh. The smarter and more aware sidekick. He can be funny though.
He is so sly with the way he can steal money from others. Such a good bastards. I enjoyed hating him.

Animation

The animation in this film is better than The Aristocats. It is less scratchy, and the coloring are nice. While the backgrounds are weird, there are a lot of cell-flipped scenes, and the infamous dance scene, I could tolerate it. Not the best or worst Xerography I have seen.

Music

The music is…… confusing. Sometimes I hear folk, other times I hear jazz, and another moment there is country music playing. It is extremely confusing and an odd music choice, since country music and jazz did not exist then. When they do folk, it is decent. None of the songs are really memorable though.

Reception at Release

When the film was released on November 8th, 1973, it did decently, from what I found. It was clear at this point that the animated films were not the first thing on the company’s minds, as most of their money came from the theme parks and merchandise. The reviews were positive, people liking it for it’s fun. “Love” was nominated for Best Song in the Academy Awards in 1974.

Reception Today

Things have changed in the past 40 years when it comes to this film. It is one of the lesser known, weaker received films in the entire canon, as many consider it as weak.

Final Score

Story: 6/10

Characters: 5.5/10

Animation: 7/10

Music: 7/10

25.5/40= 64%

Next Time…

Review: May 12th, 2014

 

Advertisements

17 thoughts on “Walt Disney Animation Studios Review: Robin Hood

  1. It didn’t really get positive reception. 51% at Rotten Tomatoes. Though it was many a child’s classic.
    Other than that, great review.

    1. When it was released in 1973 (when the Reception at Release section focuses on), it got positive. 51 is an increase from a few months ago.

  2. Eh, I think you were a bit too harsh on Prince John. Sure, he is a cry baby, but he’s actually a good complement to Robin Hood, and his motivation is pretty plausible. Not one of the best villains, but at least an enjoyable one (to me, at least.)

  3. Country music is based on folk music…which in turn is based on traditional tunes. I think they picked it because it is more or less a modern version of the classic Cantastoria (Bänkelsang), which would fit in the time. For the German version they actually snatched Reinhard Mey!!!!!
    In fact, I think the dubbing and the music is the high point of this movie. Especially “Not in Nottingham” breaks my heard…there is so much feeeeeeel in this. Well, and naturally the main tune later became the infamous hamster song.

    The other high point is the climax…that’s how you do suspense. There are a lot of higher budgeted Disney movie which don’t manage anything even close to it.

    I don’t think that it is a forgotten movie at all, mostly because it was one of the first Disney released from the Disney vault to free TV (can you imagine that this eastern Cinderella and Jungle book were shown in free TV for the first time ever in my country? Robin Hood has been around since the 1980s). For a lot of children this is the first version of Robin Hood they get to see.

    And yes I love it.

    I have to disagree concerning the animation, though…if I had to pick the worst animated canon movie, this would be my choice. Oh, they did their best…the character designs are good and they made it as fluent as possible. But the low budget shows in every single scene.

    1. Hey swanpride; it has been a while…… a month I believe. How are you?

      You think the animation is worse than Aristocats? It is not good, but Aristocats animation is treacherous.

      The music just did not make mke feel one way or another but made me confused. I also heard jazz at times, and it was very WTF.

      Well I did not exist in the 80s or early 90s, so I never knew for kids then, it was a “must watch”. It really shows how things change from generation.

      I just wrote my BatB review on Saturday, and you will be suprised.

      1. I am sorry to hear you were stressed. Good for you for getting back on even ground.

        Some of the score was a bit too jazzy.

    1. I’m not sure if I would really call it filler. It is a little bit slow going in the start and the fight during the competition is a little bit long, but all in all, every single scene has a point. Even the celebration in the woods, since it eventually leads to the situation escalating. I don’t really see any scene which you could just remove from the movie without it being noticeable.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s