Walt Disney Animation Studios Review: The Hunchback of Notre Dame

Walt Disney Animation Studio's 34th feature film.
Walt Disney Animation Studio’s 34th feature film.

http://www.firedrive.com/file/B772A272D8FE8855

My opinion right after watching film

My opinion right after watching the film is that it is a lot better than Pocahontas is. I do think that it has a lot going for it, and there is a lot of good stuff in it. The animation is good to look at, the music is phenomenal, the characters are likable, and there is a lot of story, but the tone of the movie is an issue, and I do feel like they made a mistake with the protagonist. This movie is definitely at a crossroads.

Production

I think this film started development in around 1993. Executive David Stain was reading the comic book version, and was inspired to make an animated film off of it.  Beauty and the Beast directors Gary Trousdale and Kirk Wise were working on minor projects (finished off BatB as while ago), so they easily took up this project.

There were many issues that took place adapting this film. Frollo was hard to get done, and they had to change his role a lot, as he was changed from the Archdeacon to the Judge, and his song Hellfire was almost cut from the film. I know that God Help the Oucasts had some issues as well. They made the song Someday to replace it, only to stick with God Help the Outcasts.

I could not find anything else on the production of this film.

Story

The film starts in 1482 Paris with The Bells of Notre Dame, which is narrated by Clopin (Paul Kandel), who sings about how Quasimodo (Tom Hulce)’s parents snuck into Paris, but was caught by Judge Claude Frollo (Tony Jay), and she was chased all across town, to only be kicked and cracked her head on Notre Dame, dying in front of Archedean (David Ogden Stiers) ‘s eyes, who also stops Frollo from throwing baby Quasi in the well. Frollo has to raise him as debt for killing on Notre Dame, and the old man decides to raise and leave Quasi at the attic to raise, so he can visit him whenever, and to hide him so no one will see him.

20 years later, Quasimodo is a grown, deformed redhead, who is encouraging a bird to fly, to which it eventually does. The gargoyles eventually wake up and immediately ramble obnoxiously and Hugo (Jason Alexander) farts with his armpit. I will just get this out of the way. I hate the gargoyles. I get it that they need comic relief, but they did not need to make them so damn obnoxious and over the top. They completely ruin the dark tone of the film, and distract the main plot. They mean well, but they are really grating. Them interrupting the plot is a HUGE issue in the movie. Let’s move on. Quasimodo does not feel like watching the Festivals this year because he is never allowed to go, and knows that Frollo will HATE that he wants to go to the festival, so he does not bother asked.

The gargoyles convince him to go to the festival, but as he leaves, Frollo arrives, and works with his manipulation. He almost always make Quasimodo feel like shit without really saying so. He has Quasi remembering the alphabet by making him say insults and negative words. He accidentally says Festival for F, which makes Frollo lose it.

Out There is another good song. It gives more depth to Frollo and Quasimodo's relationship, and he does get his "I Want" song. Some people say Quasimodo is bland because he is only his story of being an outcast and ugly, and.........that is kind of all he is, but they do make him a flawed, overly naive, and inexperienced character, who does go through issues....unlike Rapunzel. He wants to roam around with the normal people. Hucle did a REALLY good job with the song.
Out There is another good song. It gives more depth to Frollo and Quasimodo’s relationship, and he does get his “I Want” song. Some people say Quasimodo is bland because he is only his story of being an outcast and ugly, and………that is kind of all he is, but they do make him a flawed, overly naive, and inexperienced character, who does go through issues….unlike Rapunzel. He wants to roam around with the normal people. Hucle did a REALLY good job with the song.

So we go in the town to see war hero Phoebus (Kevin Kline) making his way back into town for being gone for “a couple of decades”. A few gypsys dancing catches his eye, and is stunned when he lays eyes on Esmeralda (Demi Moore). They share a glance, but some of her gypsy crew give the signal whistle, meaning the guards are coming. They grab her and accuse her of stealing money (that she earned from dancing), and she manages to escape. Phoebus moves his horse so the guards will fall and not get to her. She sees this and blushes. He apologizes, and they are about to curse him off, until they realize he is the Captain Phoebus.  They take him to the Palace of Justice, and he passes by a disguised Esmeralda to pick up her coins and give it back to her, leaving her shocked.

So he goes to the Palace of Justice, and Frollo is enjoying watching someone get whipped. Phoebus is not pleased that he is called to Paris to take care of “palm readers and fortune tellers”. Frollo is hoping he will be a good captain and not disappoint his last one (who I think is getting whipped for the villain’s enjoyment). They go to the festival (because it is his job as a council member) as Quasimodo sneaks out, which leads us to or third song Topsy Turvy.

 

This is another good, fun song. We see Esmeralda pole dance, making all the men want to "make it rain" if they had bills, and it explains how out there Gypsies are. It is to celebrate the opposite. So Quasimodo wins after Clopin forces him up to stir trouble, and he is praised, but for some reason, a guard throws a tomato at him, which everyone joins. This is a sad scene, and Frollo feels no way about it.  I have to call out a plohole. How did a random commoner know about the Hunchback of Notre Dame? I thought no one ever saw Quasimodo, and ti was a big secret. This makes absolutely no sense. This is easily Esmeralda's best scene in the film.
This is another good, fun song. We see Esmeralda pole dance, making all the men want to “make it rain” if they had bills, and it explains how out there Gypsies are. It is to celebrate the opposite. So Quasimodo wins after Clopin forces him up to stir trouble, and he is praised, but for some reason, a guard throws a tomato at him, which everyone joins. This is a sad scene, and Frollo feels no way about it.
I have to call out a plohole. How did a random commoner know about the Hunchback of Notre Dame? I thought no one ever saw Quasimodo, and it was a big secret. This makes absolutely no sense. This is easily Esmeralda’s best scene in the film.

Quasi ends up being covered in food, humiliated as he was tied up. Esmeralda comes out from changing, and stops the madness. Frollo tells her to stop, but she refuses and yells “JUSTICE”. This gets her into shit with Frollo, and orders Phoebus to get the guards to capture her, but she escapes with her kick ass moves and her parlor tricks, putting them to shame, and everyone cheering weirdly for her. I think they did this because everyone hates the guards so much. Quasimodo rushes inside, regretting ever leaving the attic, and realizing that Frollo is right.

Phoebus sees Esmeralda’s old person disguise enter Notre Dame, so he curiously follows her in. She senses that someone is following her, and without instinct, she grabs his sword and throws him down to the floor with no ease. He tries to calm the situation, but she is more than angry. He trips her to the floor, and they end up exchanging witty commentary as they….swordfight….with her using a candle stick. What I will say about their relationship is that Phoebus treats her like a human being. He does not praise her (Quasimodo) or treat her like a bad toy (Frollo). He says that he does not want that to happen and wants them to properly introduce themselves. She gives him an extreme side eye when he tells her his name means sun god, and when she tells him her name, they go closer to one another, before Frollo shows up.

Captain tells her to claim sanctuary, but she thinks he set her up. He tells Frollo that she claimed sanctuary, and Archdeacon tells all of them to leave. Frollo hides as everyone leaves before grabbing her by pulling her arm behind her back, and sniff her hair. He threatens her that gypsies do not do well in stone walls, and he will be waiting for her as soon as she leaves. She has a little chat with the Archedeacon, disgusted by Frollo’s actions and no one stopping to help Quasi. This leads too…

This song shows her extreme selflessness (compared to the others praying about fame, wealth, and for glory to shine on their name). It is sad that she says that she is not supposed to talk to God. Fucked up stuff.
This song shows her extreme selflessness (compared to the others praying about fame, wealth, and for glory to shine on their name). It is sad that she says that she is not supposed to talk to God. Fucked up stuff.

Quasi comes down to listen to her angelic voice, but a villager yells at him for being down there after causing enough trouble, causing him to run off and for her to follow him. She arrives at his attic, and is stunned by his sculpture of the town. They bond over not being outcasts, and they tell one another that they are good people (as he thinks every gypsy but her is ad, and he is an abomination. She realizes that Frollo is his master, and she asks him to escape with her, which he refuses. He instead offers to help her escape (as she helped him), and they do this by climbing down the outside of the church, and are almost caught by guards She gives him an artifact that holds the map of Paris in his hands, and she walks off. As soon as he manages to get back inside, he is approached by Phoebus, and the hunchback is ready to drag his ass like a gangsta so they could fight in the stairwell.

Look at that? Tell me that is ot impressive. I dare you. Anyways, Phebus came there to apologize to Esmeralda for trapping her there, and tells Quasimodo he is a good friend.
Look at that? Tell me that is not impressive. I dare you.
Anyways, Phoebus came there to apologize to Esmeralda for trapping her there, and tells Quasimodo he is a good friend.

The Gargoyles make things worse as they put in a bunch of crap in his ear, like how Phoebus was stealing his girl pretty much already happened before Quasi and Esmeralda ever met and how she likes him, which leads to the smallest and probably the weakest song Heaven’s Light, which is really only there to contrast Frollo’s burning lust and hatred for the gypsy girl, which he sings about in Hellfire. He really believes he is doing something right, and that he is being tempted by the devil. He is begging Mary and the lord to have mercy on him. It gives him a lot more depth than most other villains do not manage to get. He and Gaston are why I like the more realistic, magic-less villains. The guards tell Frollo that Esmeralda has escaped.

The next morning, Frollo goes on a bloddy rampage to look for Esmeralda, and burns houses, drowns carriages, and arrests/or kill gypsies and anyone who he thinks would help gypsies, which Phoebus slowly starts to dislike and wants no part of. This comes to a climax when he refuses to burn an innocent miller family’s house, which causes Frollo to do it himself, and the military hero to save the family. This causes him to be ordered to be beheaded by Frollo, but is saved by a disguised Esmeralda, who throws a rock at Frollo’s horse, which distracted everyone, and Phoebus managed to escape and steal Frollo’s horse. The guards shoot him down, causing him to fall over a bridge into the river. Esmeralda goes down to save her budding crush (it is amazing as to how proactive she is in this movie and how many people she saves).

I am just going to say what I think many would have been a better option and payoff from the movie; Esmeralda should ahve been the protagonist. It would have developed her romance with Phoebus better, and her friendship with Quasi as well. We could have seen more of the gypsy life. I understand he directors and company wanted to tell an Ugly Duckling story, but at around this point in the film, the plot and action centers around her instead of Quasimodo.  I know she is more interesting than our actual protagonist (as SHE was the protagonist in the book), but you need to have the majority of the focus on the main character.
I am just going to say what I think many would have been a better option and payoff from the movie; Esmeralda should have been the protagonist. It would have developed her romance with Phoebus better, and her friendship with Quasi as well. We could have seen more of the gypsy life. I understand he directors and company wanted to tell an Ugly Duckling story, but at around this point in the film, the plot and action centers around her instead of Quasimodo. I know she is more interesting than our actual protagonist (as SHE was the protagonist in the book), but you need to have the majority of the focus on the main character.

So Quasimodo is in a sad mood, and the Gargoyles do not want him to worry anymore. He approaches to look at the city gone wild, and wonders if she will be okay. Hugo says that she will be fine, with Laverne (Mary Wickens in her final role, to be replaced during the song by Jane Withers) and Victor (Charles Kimbrough) singing A Guy Like You, which is about how he will be a good boyfriend, and how Esmeralda cannot resist him, which is building him up to only get crushed, when she and her gypsy friend bring a barely conscious and injured Phoebus to the room. She asks to look out for him, and as she sets him down (and they are alone) she and Phoebus end up kissing, as he says he is not sure if his heart is pierced (and if anyone did, it is by her).

I know many people hate this kiss and Esmeralda and Phoebus as a couple, but......I do not. I think they work well together. Their relationship is underdeveloped, but they KNOW that and do not pretend like it is anything else. I do feel bad for Quasimodo in this scene, and it makes it only the more emotional. I actually like how he is a bit bitter when he talks to Phoebus later on in the film for "stealing his girl". It is clear that he is not ready for a relationship, and there is no chemistry with him and Esmeralda.
I know many people hate this kiss and Esmeralda and Phoebus as a couple, but……I do not. I think they work well together. Their relationship is underdeveloped, but they KNOW that and do not pretend like it is anything else. I do feel bad for Quasimodo in this scene, and it makes it only the more emotional. I actually like how he is a bit bitter when he talks to Phoebus later on in the film for “stealing his girl”. It is clear that he is not ready for a relationship, and there is no chemistry with him and Esmeralda.

Esmeralda and her friend have to leave, and Frollo (who realized Quasimodo is how she escaped) arrives to pay his adopted son a visit right after his lust target has left. He loses it on Quasimodo, throws the food off the table, and burns the mini statue he made about Esmeralda, telling Quasi that she is manipulating him with her dirty, gypsy spell. He reveals that he and his men found the Court of Miracles, and is planning to attack at dawn, and leaves. Phoebus (who was barely conscious) got out of the table and asks if he is going to go to the Court of Miracles with him. Still bitter, Quasimodo refuses to help Phoebus, as she has her knight in shining armor.

The two struggle to work together as he shows the captain the map, but there is smooth sailing after that. Phoebus realizes that they made it too far without a trap, which leads to the Court of Miracles song, where Clopin and the gypsies are so willing to kill them, knowing they are innocent. I am glad they are not portrayed as angels, and do get dirty. Esmeralda stops this, and tells them that her man and friend are their allies, with Phoebus warning them about Frollo coming. She runs and hugs him, and Phoebus looks at Quasimodo and pushes her off to not make the deformed man feel awkward.

Frollo and his men show up to arrest all the gypsies + Phoebus, and to tie Quasi to his room with a bunch of chains.  He cuts the gargoyles off (who was trying to encourage him to save the day), as he felt like he caused all of this. Esmeralda refuses an offer to be with Frollo (and spits in his face), so she is about to get burned, but Quasi breaks through the chains and jumps from the sky, swinging on the chain to grab her and to bring her back to his room. Phoebus and the other gypsies are released and the fight off the guards, with the Gargoyles throwing lava through the church (which proves these pests are real and not in Quasi’s imagination).

So Frollo is willing to stab Quasi as he realizes that Esmeralda “died”, but when he sees that his father is ready to stab him, he realizes everything the old man told him was a lie, and he is the bad one. Esmeralda wakes up, causing the deformed man to rush to her, and for Frollo to pick back up his sword. They end up in this long chase, with Frollo swinging the sword like a mad man. Quasi and Esme end up at the edge, and she is holding him up, with Frollo ready to kill them both, but he loses his balance and grabs onto a piece of the architecture, which breaks and smiles devilishly.

The Hunchback of Notre Dame

 

Esmeralda loses grip of Quasi, causing him to fall, but to only be caught by Phoebus , who is a few levels down. She rushes down the floors to see her two men hug one another, which makes her feel warm inside and give off a genuine smile. She runs straight to Quasi and hugs him, right before he grabs their (her and Phoebus) hands and merges them, with them eventually kissing. I have heard many complain about this ending, but I do not see the big deal about it (though it would have paid off better if Esme was the protagonist). The couple runs outside to be cheered, but she runs back to grab a nervous Quasimodo, and brings him with everyone, to only be embraced by a little girl lifted up into everyone’s arm and cheered. The film ends with Esme, her goat and Phoebus cuddle together, and Quasi being carried through the town…by the entire town as Clopin sings a small reprise of Bells of Notre Dame.

This film does have it's issues. There is too much focus shifted away from Quasimodo and given to Esmeralda (which suffers form having the wrong character as the protagonist), and the tone form dark to comedic is done horribly. We still have great (though not the deepest) characters, an engaging and full plot, and some good animation. I would not call this a bad movie, and I am glad that it is going to be on Broadway, and growing a bigger following. I think this suffered financially from being released right after Pocahontas and Toy Story, and for it being something that a general audience would not attach to again.
This film does have its issues. There is too much focus shifted away from Quasimodo and given to Esmeralda (which suffers from having the wrong character as the protagonist), and the tone from dark to comedic is done horribly. We still have great (though not the deepest) characters, an engaging and full plot, and some good animation. I would not call this a bad movie, and I am glad that it is going to be on Broadway, and growing a bigger following. I think this suffered financially from being released right after Pocahontas and Toy Story, and for it being something that a general audience would not attach to again.

Characters

The characters are for the most part likable. While some of the characters are not the deepest and could have been better, some of the characters are standouts, while others (you ALL know who) are grating, which is the nicest thing to say about them.

I like him. I feel like he is an artistic, sympathetic character, who we can easily relate too, but that is also kind of a problem..... I do see the criticisms that his character is ONLY to feel sorry for, but nothing else. I think he is fine enough, but I do think he was built to be a tritagonist and a deuteragonsit. He cannot carry a film.
I like him. I feel like he is an artistic, sympathetic character, who we can easily relate too, but that is also kind of a problem….. I do see the criticisms that his character is ONLY to feel sorry for, but nothing else. I think he is fine enough, but I do think he was built to be a tritagonist and a deuteragonsit. He cannot carry a film.
She is one of the most proactive females; especially up to this point in the canon. She is a bit defensive, and overly violent, but she does have a big heart, and wants to be better than the typical dancer. She fights for what she likes, and fights hard, and that is relatable. Oh, and if any of you are willing to rip her to shreds in the comments about choosing Phoebus, I will be ready, and we could talk about it down there.
She is one of the most proactive females; especially up to this point in the canon. She is a bit defensive, and overly violent, but she does have a big heart, and wants to be better than the typical dancer. She fights for what she likes, and fights hard, and that is relatable. Oh, and if any of you are willing to rip her to shreds in the comments about choosing Phoebus, I will be ready, and we could talk about it down there.
I think I already covered as to why he is such a good villain. He is overly realistic, and one of those really old school, overly religious, prejudice christians, and will do anything to "cleanse the town". He is really dark, and you see him struggle to not release in his deepest fantasies. He is really good, and goes after what he wants, with any issue.
I think I already covered as to why he is such a good villain. He is overly realistic, and one of those really old school, overly religious, prejudice christians, and will do anything to “cleanse the town”. He is really dark, and you see him struggle to not release in his deepest fantasies. He is really good, and goes after what he wants, with any issue.
I really like him. He is snarky (just like Esmeralda), tough, really heroic, but he does have a naughty, semi perverted side to him. He is not prejudice about sex, race, or anything. He is very go with the flow, and does help out with the plot and the characters. He is one of the guys who will be good to kick it with a beer. He is funny and relatable without trying to be.
I really like him. He is snarky (just like Esmeralda), tough, really heroic, but he does have a naughty, semi perverted side to him. He is not prejudice about sex, race, or anything. He is very go with the flow, and does help out with the plot and the characters. He is one of the guys who will be good to kick it with a beer. He is funny and relatable without trying to be.
He is......alright. Kind of funny, and VERY anti-hero-ish. He knows everything about everyone, and does not really care about anything.
He is……alright. Kind of funny, and VERY anti-hero-ish. He knows everything about everyone, and does not really care about anything.
Treacherous, grating, and unfunny at best.
Treacherous, grating, and unfunny at best.

Animation

The animation is pretty good. The details in the town and the church is very 16th or 15th century, and the character designs are less cartoony, but not Pocahontas-level realistic, as they can give wide expressions. I do not like the CGI though, and I do think it makes the film look a lot weirder.

Music

The music is very good. It has a french, catholic theme to it, which is PERFECT, and all of the song (except Court of Miracles) have use and expand on the story and characters. They are not songs that are going to make you dance like the Aladdin soundtrack, but it is more sophisticated, and really works on the musical formula. This film should have been the last of the musical format, as the others after this did not use it well, and you could do without it.

Reception at Release

When the film came out on June 21, 1996, it was clear that the Renaissance was past its peak, and things were beginning to simmer.  A part of this had to do with it being released right after the disappointing Pocahontas, and this was no less controversial than that film. it opened to the #2 spot, but saw a decline as the weeks came on, making a disappointing, but bearable $100 million in the domestic box office. It made $225 million overseas, with a total of $325,338,851. It is still the 5th highest grossing film of the year, so there is still success.

Critically……I do not know if I would call it mixed to positive reviews…yeah, I will call it that. Most liked it more than Pocahontas, and there were not too many complaints. People liked it for its deep story, great music, and more adult themes, while others hated it for ruining the book, and confused as to why this is a children’s film.

When it comes to the accolades, it went on a HUGE downhill spiral since Pocahontas. It was still nominated for many awards, like Best Music (Academy Awards), An annie for Best Animated Film (Toy Story was its only competition, and this film suffered from being released a few months after this film), many other Annies for the individual achievement, voice acting, and won 7 awards from minor award ceremonies.

The soundtrack did do well; it reached 11 on the Billboard charts.

Reception Today

It is growing a bigger reception today, but it is still not seen as a classic. There is a musical that Disney is adapting off of this film, so it is a bigger improvement. It is known as being one of the darkest films in the canon, but many do not like this film for ruining the book. It is managing to age better since 1996.

Final Score

Story: 6.5/10

Characters: 7.5/10

Animation: 8/10

Music: 9/10

= 31/40 = 78%

Next Time…

Review: August 11th, 2014
Review: August 11th, 2014
Advertisements

27 thoughts on “Walt Disney Animation Studios Review: The Hunchback of Notre Dame

  1. Yeah, I guess you remember from my own review of this movie that Quasimodo is for me firmly in the “this character is so good that he is simply bland” boat. They should have given him at least a little bit anger. And I don’t get Phoebus. His motivations are not exactly well explained in the movie.

    1. I think Phoebus’ motivation is that he wants to do his job and when that fails……protect Esmeralda and
      Quasi?

      I agree with what you said about Quasimodo. He is a rootable character, but is not strong enough to be the protagonist or to carry the film. And the fact that he is the protagonist adds more focus on him and making him more bland.

      1. Honestly, I think they go overboard with him…he is so sweet that I dislike him for being too sweet.His character is such an obvious attempt of manipulation, that I just resent him pretty soon.

  2. Favorite Disney movie right here. Favorite main character, villain, and soundtrack.

    Disagree that Quasimodo is bland. I honestly think he is quite layered and more complex than you give him credit for. Just the hesitation to go and help his friend because he was emotionally hurt by her romantic choices strikes a chord with me. It makes sense; someone who has been meet with disappointment at every turn in his life meets disappointment yet again when he believes he’s seen a light at the end of the tunnel.

    If I ever go into the intricacies in this soundtrack, I might never leave. Just let me say that the Latin mirroring the story is just brilliant. At Frollo’s demise:
    “Flammis acribus addictis (Into the searing flames)
    Voca me cum benedictis (Call me with the blessed)
    Confutatis maledictis (When the damned shall be cast down)
    Gere curam mei finis (Help me in my final hour)”

    BTW, great job on updating the blog every week. That’s quite a tall order.

    1. I don’t recall you commenting before, but it is nice to meet you and welcome to Animatedkid blog.

      I think the issue overall is that he just cannot carry the film by himself, which is an issue since he is the protagonist. He is literally something we are supposed to feel sorry for, but if you take that out of his character……..what is really there? I still like him though.

      Wow, that is some really interesting translations. They worked their ass off on the soundtrack and it shows. Really deep lyrics.

      1. Thanks for the welcome! I wish I could comment more, but I’m honestly not that passionate for Disney as a whole, heh.

        I guess my problem with the premise of “there’s not much character if you take away x, y, and z” is that the same can be said for any other Disney protagonist. Take away Belle’s supposed love of books, and what’s left? Heck, there’s many characters where you don’t even have to take anything away to see there isn’t much character there. What’s Simba but a whiny kid who blossoms into…a whiny adult? What’s Ariel but a whiny teenager? What’s Herculese but your run-of-the-mill “loveable” doofus? But I digress. =)

        Oh boy, if you’re ever bored enough, you can look up the Latin and you’ll see that just about all of it mirrors exactly what’s going on in the plot. It’s absolutely fantastic–even more so considering this was geared towards kids who would never appreciate that amount of effort.

  3. Nice job. I think that I read somewhere that the Hunchback of Notre Dame was nominated in the Razzie Awards for “Worst Writing.” Can you confirm that?

    1. Yes, it is true that it was nominated for that Razzie. What I found interesting is that the category only existed for that year. If that category went past 1996, I am sure many other animated films would have been nominated for that.

  4. I like this film. Third favorite Disney film as a matter of fact, faults and all. I read somewhere else concerning the gargoyles that they they still are, in fact, a part of Quasimodo’s imagination. The part where they are fighting off the guards at the end was argued that Quasimodo was imagining them fighting off the guards as well so he wouldn’t feel quite as guilty doing it all. And the part where they chew and shoot rocks like a machine gun was “exaggerated”. Not my theory, but just thought I’d throw that out there.

    1. So it was confirmed by the producers, Disney or the higher ups that they are still imaginary? It is a weird theory indeed. I think that with that ideas for the Gargoyles would cause a lot of “WTF” moments. I really like this film flaws and all too. Can’t help it.

      1. Actually, I think I read the theory from a comment on Youtube. Who knows what the producers or Disney higher ups said regarding them? It still is a theory, and a weird one at that. I understand why people dislike the gargoyles, but they don’t bother me too much.

        I think this is a film that you may not like it as a kid, but when you grow older you like and appreciate it more. I am glad that it has gained a huge following, as I think it’s an underrated, under appreciated, overlooked Disney movie. Also, the last Disney movie (except Mulan) for a while to have the Broadway-style theme. Hercules and Tarzan are not QUITE in the same style as HoND or the Big Four. The characters sing little, while they rely on outside characters (Muses) or professional songwriters/singers (Phil Collins) to sing the songs. Also the last to have a villain song until The Princess and the Frog (which UnshavedMouse mentioned in his PatF review). So in a sense, again, with the exception of Mulan, it’s the last of its kind for a while.

        Also, I have a feeling you’re going to rip Hercules a BIG one. I know the problems with it, and you’ve already written a review for it, but I don’t think it’s the WORST thing ever (I’m looking at you, Home on the Range and Chicken Little!). I think it’s harmless, especially if one tries not to make too big a deal on it deviating from Greek mythology.

      2. Well, the first time I watched this film was 2-3 years ago, so I would not know about kids not liking it. I do no see at all how this film is much worse than ANY film from the Big 4, but I think the biggest issue is that it was released right after the disappointing Pocahontas. I am glad that it is growing a bigger following as well.

        I firmly believe that Hunchback should have been the last film in the era to have the Broadway formula, as Hercules, Mulan, and Tarzan would not and does not benefit from it, and Hunchback and its predecessors do benefit from it. I don’t think those 3 needed songs in their films at all. I do understand that there are some differences with Hunchback and its immediate successors, but Mulan and Hercules (especially Hercules) tries to follow that formula still. I never noticed that Hunchback was the last film to have a villain song until PatF. Thanks for the tidbit.

        Well, I do call out a lot of the issues with the film, but I will tear into films A LOT harder than Hercules. I literally just wrote the Home on the Range and Chicken Little reviews, and HOLY FUCK did it take me forever to be in the proper mind to finish those reviews. I do somewhat rip into Hercules, but not as much as you are expecting.

      3. They’re meant to be imaginary. Trousedale and Wise mention it in the commentary, I believe.

        Also, it’s stated in “The Art of The Hunchback of Notre Dame”. http://i.imgur.com/bAZ1S8n.jpg “Yet, the moviemakers made a conscious choice not to have real magic; instead they enivisioned the gargoyles as creatures of Quasimodo’s imagination.”

        (Let me know if the picture shows up for you) =)

  5. This movie frustrates me because I feel like they should have gone all adult or all children. Combining home alone style violence at the end, gargoyles joking around and a song about rape and murder and a character who is going to drop a baby down a well and burn a family in a house is just too much. It makes you feel like a ping pong ball batted around.
    I admire what they were trying to do but in the end it was a failure for me. They should have gone the pans labyrinth route and made it an R adults only. That would have been cool and different and fit the story and animation. Also making Frollo a judge was a big mistake. Why would the archdeacon allow all this to happen under his nose? It doesn’t make any sense. In the book Frollo is the Archdeacon so it makes sense. I think by trying to not tick off Catholics they made them look negligent and even worse.
    In the end, too violent for a kids movie, and too silly in section for an adults-only movie. Beautiful animation though. Sigh…

    1. Well, I did not read the book, so maybe that is why the judge thing does not bother me at all. The whole Catholism thing I try to steer from overall.

      I know this film is a lot more mature, but I think there are WRAS films that are more violent than this one.

      1. It’s not just a change in character but a change in the story. Why would an archdeacon allow a madmen to raise a child in his church? It doesn’t make sense. When Frollo was the Archdeacon it made sense because he felt guilty for killing the mother. So it’s not an incidental change from the book.

        Definitely the most violent kids movie I’ve ever seen but that’s just me I guess. It does have things I like I just wish they had gone all the way and not tried to please kids at all, kept a consistent tone.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s